What we commit to
Custody architected in tiers
Hot, warm and cold with multi-approval workflows and withdrawal thresholds. Check it by asking to see the key management design before you sign.
Economics modelled adversarially
Flash loan, oracle manipulation and governance attack scenarios costed before implementation. Check it by asking for the risk report from stage two.
Independent audit before mainnet
Third-party review, remediation and retest on every value-holding path. Check it by asking which auditors and seeing the report.
Liquidity arranged before launch
Market maker or aggregated liquidity in place at go-live. Check it by asking who the counterparties are.
Honest timelines
If licensing or banking makes your date unrealistic, we say so in scoping. Check it by asking what could delay your launch.
Full source code ownership
Engine, contracts, apps and infrastructure transfer on delivery under your keys. Check it by asking what you cannot take with you.
Where we are a poor fit
Being specific about this saves everyone time.
- You need a launch next month and the product requires a licence you have not applied for.
- You want the cheapest possible build and consider audit an optional line item.
- You need a guaranteed-yield product without a fundable source for that yield.
- You want a pixel copy of a specific company interface and brand.
- You need ongoing operation rather than a platform you will run yourself.
If one of these describes your situation, we will tell you in the first call rather than three months in.
How we compare on the things that matter
Speed
White label deployments launch in 4 to 6 weeks. Custom platforms take 10 to 16. We do not quote faster than we can audit.
Security
Independent audit and penetration testing before launch, with remediation completed rather than noted.
Compliance
Verification tiers, product restrictions and reporting built from your counsel advice, not a template.
Ownership
Source code, scripts and runbooks transfer completely. No licensing dependency on us afterwards.
Support
Weekly written updates, staging access throughout, and a demo at the close of each stage.
Honesty
We name what the software does not solve, in writing, during scoping.
The alternatives, described fairly
You have four real options. Here is when each beats us, written so you can actually use it.
Build in-house
Best when blockchain is your core product and you will keep a team long-term. Slower to start and you carry the hiring risk.
A cheaper offshore shop
Genuinely cheaper. The difference usually shows in custody architecture, audit discipline and whether anyone tells you what will not work.
A large consultancy
Stronger for enterprise procurement and multi-year programmes. Typically slower, more expensive, and further from the engineers.
A rented white label
Fastest and lowest cost. You do not own it, cannot change it structurally, and depend on the vendor continuing to operate.
Us
Best when you want a platform you own outright, launched in weeks to months, with custody and compliance engineered rather than assumed.
Nobody
Sometimes the honest answer. If your model needs a licence you have not applied for, waiting costs less than building.
Questions worth asking any vendor
Including us. If a vendor cannot answer these clearly, that is information.
Who owns the code afterwards?
Ask for it in writing. "Full ownership" sometimes means a licence that ends when you stop paying.
Who audits the contracts?
Ask for the firm name and a past report. "We audit internally" is not an independent audit.
What happens to my funds if you disappear?
A platform you cannot deploy or operate without the vendor is a dependency, not an asset.
Where does the liquidity come from?
If the answer is vague, there is no liquidity plan and your launch will be quiet.
Which of my requirements will not work?
A vendor who says "all of it is possible" has not read your requirements properly.
Can I talk to a past client?
A vendor with delivered work can arrange this. One who cannot is telling you something.